LIVE FROM FACEBOOK, the World of KMØSSED "tit" debate continues....

Until Never WoW!
Amazing jewels by Rosie Kavanavoch, now available for viewing online.
p.s.Until Never is closed Easter Friday but open on Saturday, drop by and see Rosie's Kmossed show!

Russia HQ ∑hat a Mannquin.
April 1 at 8:18pm ·

Blakk Byrd I'm surprised anyone could post anything so sexist. Its so last century.
Sun at 1:29pm · Report


Until Never You might like to read more about The World of Kmossed, straight from the artists hand/mouth.
http://www.kmossed.com/

"i'm bored. But at least my necklace matches my head + my tits". RK 2010
Sun at 3:10pm · Report

Blakk Byrd I don't need to, Anyone who needs to resort to "tits' to get attention clearly doesn't have any substance to their work. Sorry, but it doesn't appear to live up to the standard I would expect from Until Never.
Sun at 6:21pm · Report

Russia HQ "I've got blinkers on, I don't feel like taking them off my titmouses."
-Rosie Kavanavoch
Sun at 7:07pm
·
Nadine Axmer Talalla work of art to me....
Mon at 6:48am · Report

Din Heagney I don't see how part of an artist's (or anyone's) body is sexist. That statement is clearly from someone who knows nothing about the history of art or its relationship to fashion and the body. BB you even refuse to read the artist statement... That's a fail.
Mon at 10:17am · Report

Cimony Vanderpol the human body is a beautiful thing. so chill out black beard!
Yesterday at 6:56pm · Report

Blakk Byrd Din, I'm the author of bellebyrd and blakkbyrd blogs, you might like to check them out, in particular everything under the 'feminist' tag. This article will help you understand what is sexist, when you've read and watched it get back to me
http://printaustralia.blogspot.com/2006/12/advertisings-image-of-women.html
I made my comment to open a debate on the appropriateness of exploiting women's bodies for financial gain.
Yesterday at 10:24pm · Report

Din Heagney Well, in this instance the artist in question, RK, has used her own body to model her own jewellery, she has also chosen to feature these images online as an extension of her current exhibition which explores (critically and with humour) the various ways women's bodies are associated with, and used in, fashion, advertising and art. This exhibition was featured as part of the Cultural Program for the L'Oreal Melbourne Fashion Festival and is as much about celebrating the female form as critiquing its use in popular culture. While Kilbourne's documentary treads old ground, there is perhaps a better article on this topic here which includes the comment: "Several feminist artists in the 1970s were criticized for using their nude bodies in their work, especially if they were beautiful. In effect, women were not allowed to be beautiful and at the same time be successful with their work." I think this is exactly what you are doing, placing further limitations of female artists and the female body. http://www.artwomen.org/DoubleTrouble/dt-p4.htm
23 minutes ago · Report

Ben Divall
@BB: please clarify exactly what part of your posts encourages any form of debate?

Perhaps it was this:
"Anyone who needs to resort to "tits' to get attention clearly doesn't have any substance to their work"
... See More
Or this:
"This article will help you understand what is sexist, when you've read and watched it get back to me"

Can I suggest you either engage with the work in an intelligent way, or don't bother? Maybe next time you could discover a little about the artist's intentions before indulging in so much gratuitous facebook chest-puffing?

Your nest may be a sheltered place, but please don't air your ignorance here and expect to go unchallenged. Not tonight, Josephine.